India’s DOOH Revenue Could Nearly Match Static OOH by 2030, PwC Forecast Says

A PwC forecast reported by DOOH Digital projects India's DOOH revenue rising to roughly half of total OOH by 2030, while physical OOH remains only slightly larger in the forecast.

Summary

A PwC forecast reported by DOOH Digital projects India's DOOH revenue rising to roughly half of total OOH by 2030, while physical OOH remains only slightly larger in the forecast.

What happened

A PwC forecast reported by DOOH Digital projects India's DOOH revenue rising to roughly half of total OOH by 2030, while physical OOH remains only slightly larger in the forecast.

The underlying source identifies several details that matter for planners:

Those facts should be read in the context of the source and the specific market. Network operators, brands and technology companies frequently publish their own reach, impression, sales-lift or market-size figures. Where a number is a company claim, case-study result or forecast, Billboard Guide treats it as attributed evidence rather than a universal benchmark.

The reported forecast puts DOOH revenue at about $193 million in 2025 and $318.5 million in 2030

Physical OOH is reported at about $365.9 million in 2025 and $326.3 million in 2030

The implied DOOH share rises from roughly 34.5% to about 49%

Physical OOH remains marginally larger in the 2030 forecast.

Why this matters for OOH and DOOH advertisers

If the forecast direction holds, media owners and buyers will need to plan for a market where digital flexibility is no longer a niche premium layer but a near-equal part of the outdoor revenue mix.

For media planners, the important distinction is between easier transaction and better decision-making. Programmatic access can shorten booking workflows, but it does not automatically make every eligible screen a good screen. Audience definition, venue context, viewability in the physical environment, verification and post-campaign methodology still need to be understood before budgets are compared.

The geographic context is also important. This story involves India, PwC. In out-of-home media, location is part of the product itself: it shapes the likely audience, viewing speed, dwell time, competitive clutter and the cultural meaning of the placement. That is why two screens with similar technical specifications can have very different strategic value.

Media and creative implications

A buyer evaluating a similar opportunity should separate four layers of value. Media quality covers visibility, orientation, dwell time and physical context. Audience quality asks whether the people moving through the environment match the campaign objective. Creative fit asks whether the asset is readable and distinctive under real viewing conditions. Operational quality includes availability, proof-of-play or posting evidence, compliance, maintenance and reporting.

For India’s, the most relevant lesson is the connection between the media format and the proposition being communicated. Outdoor is strongest when the medium reduces explanation rather than creating more of it. A viewer should be able to identify the advertiser, understand the central idea and retain one useful memory before the exposure ends.

This is also where SEO and real-world campaign planning overlap. People searching for India DOOH market forecast 2030 are usually looking for a concrete combination of brand, format and place. Naming those entities clearly makes the article more useful to a human planner and easier for search engines and AI systems to understand without resorting to repetitive keyword stuffing.

What advertisers should ask before buying something similar

Pricing should be checked directly with the media owner or authorized sales partner because rates, minimum booking periods, programmatic availability and production requirements can change. Likewise, campaign performance should not be inferred from the creative alone: media weight, placement quality, duration, competitive activity and broader marketing support all contribute to the result.

Ask exactly how delivery, impressions or audience segments are defined before comparing vendors. Similar labels can hide different methodologies.

Separate verification from audience measurement. Proof that an ad played is not the same as proof of who saw it or what happened afterward.

Check whether the data can be reconciled at campaign, screen and creative level so reporting does not become a manual post-campaign exercise.

Use automation to improve relevance and speed, not to skip the physical-media questions of visibility, venue context and creative legibility.